TV for Men?From Menletter December 2007 By Tim Baehr Yeah, there's Spike TV - a cable outlet specializing in booze, boobs, and video games. I haven't indulged. I probably missed their target demographic by, say, 40 years. But there are some other shows that I'd like to comment on. Jon & Kate plus 8Monday nights at Jon and Kate Gosselin first had twins, the result of fertility treatments. When they tried to add to their family, they had sextuplets. The show chronicles their life as a family. Jon is an information technology specialist. Kate, a former nurse, is a stay-at-home mom. The shows follow the Gosselins around as they take all eight kids to the dentist, to a theme park, to a restaurant, to a pumpkin patch, to a parade - anywhere a "normal" family might go. Aware of the inevitable media attention and danger of the family's becoming a kind of freak show, the Gosselin parents decided not to retreat into isolation. They have worked hard to provide as typical a family experience as possible, regardless of the logistical difficulties. Each 30-minute episode consists of a cinema-verite-like account of some aspect of the family's life (the abovementioned outings, or packing and moving to a bigger house, or Kate's tummy-tuck surgery to repair the damage from carrying the sextuplets), interspersed with Jon and Kate sitting on a loveseat and talking to the camera. I find a few aspects of the show compelling. The kids are reasonably well-behaved, at least on-camera, but they are LOUD. The overall impression is that of a daily 15-hour birthday party in one of the smallest rooms at Chuck E. Cheese. The only ones who don't yell and shout are Jon and Kate. It's not as though Jon and Kate are always cheerful. They snap at each other as they communicate about the tasks that will get them through the day. And Kate makes droll asides about the kids to the off-screen crew. This led a psychologist friend of mine to fret that Kate is not a very nice person. But Kate and Jon are both short with each other. Moreover, Kate has explained that, in the heat of the moment - for instance, packing the van for a trip and herding the kids around without losing any - their communication is very curt and task-oriented. If they negotiated everything, or even made nice, the whole enterprise could fall apart. In the couple's asides to the camera crew, and in their loveseat interviews, both Jon and Kate show a deadpan humor that bespeaks their deep love for the kids, and for each other. The Gosselins have worked out a division of labor and a fairly regimented, but not rigid, way to get through each day and week. They have little outside help, and apparently not a lot of money. As bizarre as their family circumstances may seem, they could be a model of how a family might function both effectively and lovingly. I admire Jon particularly because he combines his totally unreserved love for Kate and the kids with a self-contained, matter-of-fact, good-humored approach to living in near-total chaos. While some men might be overwhelmed by the essential neediness of children and Kate's occasionally sharp tongue, Jon never seems to evince any doubt about who he is. He gives as good as he gets, not only in the verbal sparring but in commitment and love. Dirty JobsTuesdays at Mike Rowe is a TV guy
who, since 2003, has been seeking out the dirtiest, messiest, most dangerous
jobs and then serving as a (usually) able assistant - walking the talk, as it
were. He has waded (and paddled a boat) in cow poop, hauled bags of garbage
through apartment houses out to the waiting truck, worked on a lobster boat,
picked through recyclables, made sausage, cleaned out septic tanks, and at
almost uncountable other jobs. He begins each show with this blurb: "My
name is Mike Rowe, and this is my job: I explore the country looking for
people who aren't afraid to get dirty - hard-working men and women who earn
an honest living doing the kinds of jobs that make civilized life possible
for the rest of us. Now... get ready, to get dirty." I find the show immensely
appealing, not because of the often-yucky subject matter, but because Mike,
in his self-deprecating way, is game for anything. Also, he engages with the
people who do the dirty work of our society with the utmost respect. The
topics of most shows have a very high eeewww
factor, but they're fascinating because we almost never get to see the things
that go on beyond the surface of our cities and suburban neighborhoods. There's one tiny bit of
false advertising in Mike's intro, however, when he talks about the "men
and women who earn an honest living. . . ." In all the episodes I've
seen so far, there was exactly one woman in a dirty and dangerous job - a
firefighter. All the rest of the
people "doing the kinds of jobs that make civilized life possible for
the rest of us" were men. Why do I even bother to
point this out (or the fact that no women are protesting being excluded from
the jobs)? Warren Farrell wrote at least five years ago about the "glass
cellar" - the kinds of jobs Mike glorifies and which Farrell calls the
"death professions." Of the 25 worst jobs listed in the Jobs Rated
Almanac, 24 employ more than 85 percent men. And, according to Farrell, 93
percent of people killed at work are men. (See http://www.warrenfarrell.com/articles.php?id=9.) Why indeed? I have
never seen Farrell or anyone else lobbying to pass laws requiring that women
take half the jobs in the death professions. And I'm not about to lead any
protest marches. What we can do, especially those of us operating nothing
more dangerous than a desk or a keyboard, is to be keenly aware of and
appreciative of the men who make our lives so comparatively cushy. Regardless
of why a man may have taken a Dirty Job - lack of other opportunities, a
desire to feel heroic, or even because he loves it - he deserves nothing but
our respect and admiration.
|